Back to driving schools

Rijschool Nemo

SCHAGENAutomatic available
Driving lessons — Price unavailable Pass rate47.6%42 first attempts · CBR
Contact Compare schools Manage this page

CBR exam results

2025-07-01 / 2026-06-30
Auto · B — Exam results
ExamFirst examsPassed first timeRetakesPassed on a retake
All transmissions4220 passed47.6%3920 passed51.3%
Manual3717 passed45.9%3417 passed50%
Automatic53 passed60%53 passed60%

All transmissions

First exams
47.6% 20 of 42 passed
Retakes
51.3% 20 of 39 passed

Manual

First exams
45.9% 17 of 37 passed
Retakes
50% 17 of 34 passed

Automatic

First exams
60% 3 of 5 passed
Retakes
60% 3 of 5 passed
About these figures

Auto · B. Standard practical exams only.

All transmissions also includes any combined-transmission results, so the subcategories may not add up to the total. No automatic results does not mean the school does not offer automatic lessons.

Pass rate over time

2015–2026 · 44 reporting periods

First attemptRetakes
0%25%50%75%100%20152017201920212022202420262014-10-01 / 2015-09-30: 60%2014-10-01 / 2015-09-30: 60.5%2015-01-01 / 2015-12-31: 55.4%2015-01-01 / 2015-12-31: 49.1%2015-04-01 / 2016-03-31: 60.4%2015-04-01 / 2016-03-31: 50%2015-07-01 / 2016-06-30: 61.2%2015-07-01 / 2016-06-30: 49.2%2015-10-01 / 2016-09-30: 61.2%2015-10-01 / 2016-09-30: 40.6%2016-01-01 / 2016-12-31: 61.3%2016-01-01 / 2016-12-31: 48.4%2016-04-01 / 2017-03-31: 60%2016-04-01 / 2017-03-31: 46%2016-07-01 / 2017-06-30: 51.7%2016-07-01 / 2017-06-30: 43.7%2016-10-01 / 2017-09-30: 50%2016-10-01 / 2017-09-30: 45.8%2017-01-01 / 2017-12-31: 48.6%2017-01-01 / 2017-12-31: 46.4%2017-04-01 / 2018-03-31: 54.3%2017-04-01 / 2018-03-31: 51.6%2017-07-01 / 2018-06-30: 64.1%2017-07-01 / 2018-06-30: 51%2017-10-01 / 2018-09-30: 64%2017-10-01 / 2018-09-30: 56.3%2018-01-01 / 2018-12-31: 65.9%2018-01-01 / 2018-12-31: 58.5%2018-04-01 / 2019-03-31: 57%2018-04-01 / 2019-03-31: 54.9%2018-07-01 / 2019-06-30: 57.3%2018-07-01 / 2019-06-30: 53.7%2018-10-01 / 2019-09-30: 57.7%2018-10-01 / 2019-09-30: 52.5%2019-01-01 / 2019-12-31: 57.7%2019-01-01 / 2019-12-31: 59.2%2019-04-01 / 2020-03-31: 62.1%2019-04-01 / 2020-03-31: 57.1%2019-07-01 / 2020-06-30: 61%2019-07-01 / 2020-06-30: 64%2019-10-01 / 2020-09-30: 64.6%2019-10-01 / 2020-09-30: 69.8%2020-01-01 / 2020-12-31: 63.2%2020-01-01 / 2020-12-31: 57.1%2020-04-01 / 2021-03-31: 56%2020-04-01 / 2021-03-31: 61.9%2020-07-01 / 2021-06-30: 53.1%2020-07-01 / 2021-06-30: 48.3%2020-10-01 / 2021-09-30: 46.7%2020-10-01 / 2021-09-30: 47.7%2021-01-01 / 2021-12-31: 45.3%2021-01-01 / 2021-12-31: 52.9%2021-04-01 / 2022-03-31: 58.6%2021-04-01 / 2022-03-31: 49.1%2021-07-01 / 2022-06-30: 60.7%2021-07-01 / 2022-06-30: 55.3%2021-10-01 / 2022-09-30: 58.6%2021-10-01 / 2022-09-30: 58.3%2022-01-01 / 2022-12-31: 50%2022-01-01 / 2022-12-31: 52.5%2022-04-01 / 2023-03-31: 45.9%2022-04-01 / 2023-03-31: 65.2%2022-07-01 / 2023-06-30: 38.2%2022-07-01 / 2023-06-30: 62.8%2022-10-01 / 2023-09-30: 39.7%2022-10-01 / 2023-09-30: 62.5%2023-01-01 / 2023-12-31: 46.9%2023-01-01 / 2023-12-31: 60%2023-04-01 / 2024-03-31: 46.4%2023-04-01 / 2024-03-31: 51%2023-07-01 / 2024-06-30: 55.6%2023-07-01 / 2024-06-30: 57.1%2023-10-01 / 2024-09-30: 63%2023-10-01 / 2024-09-30: 61.4%2024-01-01 / 2024-12-31: 63%2024-01-01 / 2024-12-31: 63.2%2024-04-01 / 2025-03-31: 58.5%2024-04-01 / 2025-03-31: 54.3%2024-06-01 / 2025-06-30: 54.2%2024-06-01 / 2025-06-30: 51.3%2024-10-01 / 2025-09-30: 51.7%2024-10-01 / 2025-09-30: 40.9%2025-01-01 / 2025-12-31: 48.2%2025-01-01 / 2025-12-31: 48.2%2025-04-01 / 2026-03-31: 50%2025-04-01 / 2026-03-31: 52.1%2025-07-01 / 2026-06-30: 47.6%2025-07-01 / 2026-06-30: 51.3%
First attempt47.6%42 exams
Retakes51.3%39 exams
CBR source file ↗
All figures and notes (44)

CBR periods overlap and are not added together. Missing data does not mean 0%.

Results per CBR school code. Students and exam timing affect the figures.

PeriodFirst attemptPass rateRetakesPass rate
2025-07-01 / 2026-06-304247.6%3951.3%
2025-04-01 / 2026-03-315250%4852.1%
2025-01-01 / 2025-12-315648.2%5648.2%
2024-10-01 / 2025-09-306051.7%4440.9%
2024-06-01 / 2025-06-305954.2%3951.3%
2024-04-01 / 2025-03-315358.5%3554.3%
2024-01-01 / 2024-12-315463%3863.2%
2023-10-01 / 2024-09-305463%4461.4%
2023-07-01 / 2024-06-305455.6%4957.1%
2023-04-01 / 2024-03-315646.4%4951%
2023-01-01 / 2023-12-316446.9%4560%
2022-10-01 / 2023-09-307339.7%4862.5%
2022-07-01 / 2023-06-306838.2%4362.8%
2022-04-01 / 2023-03-316145.9%4665.2%
2022-01-01 / 2022-12-316850%4052.5%
2021-10-01 / 2022-09-305858.6%3658.3%
2021-07-01 / 2022-06-306160.7%4755.3%
2021-04-01 / 2022-03-317058.6%5549.1%
2021-01-01 / 2021-12-315345.3%5152.9%
2020-10-01 / 2021-09-306046.7%4447.7%
2020-07-01 / 2021-06-306453.1%2948.3%
2020-04-01 / 2021-03-315056%2161.9%
2020-01-01 / 2020-12-316863.2%2857.1%
2019-10-01 / 2020-09-307964.6%4369.8%
2019-07-01 / 2020-06-308261%5064%
2019-04-01 / 2020-03-3111662.1%6357.1%
2019-01-01 / 2019-12-3112357.7%7159.2%
2018-10-01 / 2019-09-3011157.7%6152.5%
2018-07-01 / 2019-06-3011757.3%6753.7%
2018-04-01 / 2019-03-3110757%5154.9%
2018-01-01 / 2018-12-319165.9%4158.5%
2017-10-01 / 2018-09-308964%4856.3%
2017-07-01 / 2018-06-307864.1%5151%
2017-04-01 / 2018-03-317054.3%6251.6%
2017-01-01 / 2017-12-317248.6%6946.4%
2016-10-01 / 2017-09-307850%7245.8%
2016-07-01 / 2017-06-308751.7%7143.7%
2016-04-01 / 2017-03-319560%6346%
2016-01-01 / 2016-12-3110661.3%6248.4%
2015-10-01 / 2016-09-309861.2%6440.6%
2015-07-01 / 2016-06-3010361.2%5949.2%
2015-04-01 / 2016-03-319160.4%5850%
2015-01-01 / 2015-12-318355.4%5349.1%
2014-10-01 / 2015-09-308060%3860.5%
Local comparison

How does this school compare?

Position at CBR —

Insufficient data for a position at CBR Haarlem.

See the full ranking at CBR Haarlem
First attempt 47.6% 42 first exams at this centre
Exam centre Haarlem 2025-07-01 – 2026-06-30
How do we compare?

We compare the same vehicle category and reporting period at the same CBR exam centre. Only first exams at this centre count, not the school total. The school's busiest centre is selected initially. The comparison score weights CBR results at 70% and the whole-school Google rating at 30%. For CBR we use the 95% Wilson lower bound, which accounts for exam volume. A lower bound of 30% gives 0 component points and 70% gives 100, with a linear scale between them. This is not the ordinary pass percentage. Google uses 20 reviews at 4.05 as a neutral prior, reducing the influence of small samples. An adjusted Google rating of 3.2 gives 0 component points and 4.9 gives 100, with a linear scale between them. Each component is capped outside these thresholds. A score requires at least 10 first exams at this centre and 5 Google reviews. The Wilson lower bound already discounts small samples, so a smaller school enters without an advantage. A rank requires 5 comparable schools; ties share a position. These thresholds are editorial choices, not measured population limits. Ranking uses the unrounded score; rounded scores can appear tied. Prices are excluded. This is our editorial comparison, not a CBR endorsement or a prediction of your pass probability.

Reviews on Google

Review text is not available for this school yet.

About the school

Rijschool Nemo is opgericht met één duidelijke missie: het aanbieden van hoogwaardige rijlessen in een veilige en comfortabele omgeving. Wat maakt ons uniek? Al meer dan 10 jaar helpen we leerlingen succesvol hun rijbewijs te behalen. Met ons brede aanbod aan autorijlessen vind je altijd een lespakket dat perfect aansluit op jouw wensen en leerstijl. Daarnaast zijn al onze instructeurs in het bezit van een VOG (Verklaring Omtrent het Gedrag), zodat je met een gerust gevoel de weg op gaat. Bij Rijschool Nemo staan eerlijkheid, transparantie en persoonlijke aandacht centraal. Wij zorgen ervoor dat jij je volledig op je gemak voelt tijdens de rijlessen. Onze lessen worden gegeven in een rookvrije auto en we hanteren scherpe, betaalbare tarieven. Zo maken we het mogelijk om op een prettige en efficiënte manier jouw rijbewijs te halen. Samen bereiden we je optimaal voor op jouw rijexamen! Zelf doe ik dit werk al heel lang met veel plezier. Ik vind een gezellige en rustige sfeer in de auto erg belangrijk, want daarbij is het leerresultaat een stuk hoger. Ik zou zeggen: aarzel niet en neem een proefles bij ons en je zult zien dat wij onze slogan “Rijschool Nemo, beter dan goed” waar maken! Mijn naam is Hans Hoenderdos. Samen met mijn zoon Nemo run ik rijschool Nemo. Ik doe dit werk al ruim 30 jaar. Wat mij hierin aanspreekt is de vrijheid en het persoonlijk contact met de leerlingen. Ik werk al een ruime tijd bij Rijschool Nemo en mijn werkdagen zijn alle doordeweekse dagen plus de zaterdagochtend.Ik verwelkom je graag bij mij in de les. Tot snel!

Read more on the school website ↗
  • 3 staff

Instructors (3)

  • Nemo Hoenderdos
  • Hans Hoenderdos
  • Alex Roossien
Source: school website ↗

Lesson prices and packages

Driving lessons

Driving lessons — Lesson prices and packages
OfferWhat you getPricePer hour
Start pakket 60 min incl. theoriecursus€899.00—

Prices from the school; confirm current offers. Compare hourly rates for individual lessons only.

Price details and other categories

Prices read on 9/5/2026.

Contact and location

CBR school code
5041U1
Address
Leng
1741RP Schagen
Phone
+31641480751
Email
[email protected]
Website
rijschoolnemo.nl
On the map1 school

Approximate locations: town centres, not verified lesson addresses.

Exam locations

  • Haarlem (Professor Eijkmanlaan 2-4)

These are exam locations from the reporting period, not confirmed teaching or pickup areas.

Questions for your trial lesson
  • Will I keep the same instructor, and how often can I take lessons?
  • What does a lesson cost, how long is it and what does a package include?
  • What are the cancellation, withdrawal and refund terms?
  • How will we discuss my progress and readiness for the exam?
Sources and corrections

School details come from its own website and may be out of date.

Sources: School

Imported on 2026-09-03. The ranking is produced by Theorio, not an endorsement by CBR. If information appears incorrectly matched, include the school code when contacting us.

Check with CBR ↗ CBR source file ↓Our methodologyReport an error ↗